The Medicare environment is constantly changing, and currently, one of the most influential frameworks that influences the reimbursement is the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). In the case of physicians employed in the inpatient setting, and physicians working in the hospital setting, it is necessary to know what they need to report, and how they must report it in order to comply and maximize reimbursement. With the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) stepping up its oversight and raising its accountability standards, providers need to be aware of MIPS reporting requirements so that they can receive the maximum performance-based incentives without experiencing penalties.
The Implication of MIPS on Inpatient Clinicians.
MIPS as a quality pay program (QPP) was established as a part of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA). Managed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, MIPS modifies Medicare Part B payments according to performance on a number of categories. Although a significant portion of the initial debate on MIPS was limited to outpatient practices, inpatient physicians, such as hospitalists, intensivists, and some specialties, are also impacted based on their billing system and involvement.
Clinicians in a hospital are frequently assessed in varied ways with regards to whether they should be considered as a facility-based under CMS regulation. In case a provider provides most of the covered services in an inpatient or emergency department care, CMS will automatically assign a facility-based score based on the performance of the hospital in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Nevertheless, this does not absolve clinicians of knowing how their performances lead to general scoring.
Basic Performance Areas that influence Inpatient Reporting.
The performance in MIPS is assessed based on four weighted categories, namely Quality, Cost, Improvement Activities, and Promoting Interoperability. In the case of inpatient providers, each category may be considered more or less relevant based on its designation and reporting.
The Quality category is the one that usually has the greatest impact. Measures that are usually reported by inpatient clinicians indicate the outcomes of care coordination, patient safety, readmission rates, and the right utilization of diagnostics. Measures can be consistent with the hospital-wide initiatives such as sepsis management protocols or minimization of surgical complications. Accuracy and prompt submission of the data is important as CMS compares the performance with the national standards.
The payment measures are automatically determined by CMS based on claims and, therefore, inpatient clinicians are not required to report this information. Cost efficiency is, however, measured on attributed care breaches. In the case of hospital-based physicians, shared care planning and discharge organization has a large role in determining the cost performance outcomes.
Improvement Activities involve involvement in actions that lead to improved patient care (e.g. multidisciplinary rounds, patient safety programs or care transition programs). This can be met by many inpatient providers who can be actively involved in quality improvement programs led by the hospital.
Promoting Interoperability, which was previously called Advancing Care Information, focuses on how to successfully utilize certified electronic health record (EHR) technology. Certain inpatient clinicians can also receive reweighting of this category in case they are included in the category of hospital-based, yet the EHR engagement will still be essential towards compliance.
The Costs of Facility-Based Scoring on Inpatient Providers.
CMS defines a clinician as facility-based when 75 percent or higher of covered services of the professional service are in-patient hospital, on-campus outpatient hospital or emergency department settings. On the one hand, provided the eligibility, the Quality and Cost performance of the clinician can be automatically calculated based on the score of the hospital in the VBP program.
This organization has the potential to make reporting easier, yet it does not mean to avoid responsibility. The providers will need to determine whether they are eligible or not by using the QPP portal and ensuring that the score assigned to them is the result of the appropriate participation. In case a clinician suspects that they may score higher using individual reporting, CMS may be submitted using traditional MIPS procedures rather than using facility-based scoring.
Assuring Proper and on time Submission.
Early preparations are the starting point of the successful completion of MIPS reporting requirements. Compliance leads should be assigned in the inpatient groups or work jointly with the hospital quality departments to ensure that there is alignment of reporting measures. Items of data validation are also necessary because errors in submitting data may result in the deduction of scores or even disqualification.
The bulk of the reporting is done using approved methods of submission, either via qualified registries, electronic health record integration or CMS Web Interface, based on eligibility. The deadlines are usually on the first quarter of the following performance year, and the submissions that are not received on time are not accepted without relevant exceptions.
Clinicians are also supposed to track the final score and payment adjustment factor, which is released by CMS at the end of the performance year. Two years later, adjustments of payment, which could be positive, neutral, or negative, are made, and the necessity of forward planning is supported.
The Common Compliance Pitfalls to Avoid.
A typical misconception among the inpatient clinicians is that hospital employment means that they have no personal responsibility anymore. Although the hospitals can take care of most of the infrastructure, the CMS eventually awards scores on the clinician or group level. The other solution is another common problem with not recording improvement activities or use of EHR comprehensively, particularly in relying on reweighting provisions.
These errors can be avoided by proactive interaction with compliance officers and constant education on the changes in rules to be followed annually. CMS revises the performance thresholds and category weights, as well as the availability of measures annually, which is why it is important to monitor continuously.
MIPS Participation in the Long Term.
MIPS is not a reporting requirement, but a performance-based reimbursement that has a direct impact on revenue stability. Good performance may allow making positive payment adjustments and improvement in the professional image of a clinician in the framework of value-based care. On the other hand, lack of compliance can lead to fines and lack of credibility in the quality reporting.
In both inpatient and facilities, the understanding of the structure and strategic implementation of MIPS reporting requirements enhances adherence to national healthcare quality objectives. By being aware of the types of performances, ensuring that patients are of eligible status, keeping the records correct, and submitting in a timely manner, the clinicians will be able to survive the changing environment of Medicare reimbursements, as well as prove their accountability, transparency, and resolve to serve their patients with high quality.
READ ALSO: Why Every Family Should Consider Adding Chiropractic Care to Their Wellness Routine
